data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffa0a/ffa0a47e2ec6dc27680ff0e94671e82e416f544b" alt="Have drunk drivers killed more people than wars"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0082f/0082fb537bde7a8cbdf92524442ec163560a9744" alt="have drunk drivers killed more people than wars have drunk drivers killed more people than wars"
Notably, the decision does not purport to overturn the 1939 Supreme Court case of U.S. In a very concise breakdown, the NRA said that the essence of the Heller decision is that Americans have a right to possess the sorts of bearable arms “in common use for lawful purposes,” particularly self-defense, and that handguns qualify because they are overwhelmingly chosen by responsible, law-abiding persons for that purpose. Heller: He claimed the decision says, “the Second Amendment gives you a right to a handgun for purposes of self-defense and a rifle for purposes of hunting or recreation, but nowhere does it give you a right to weapons of war.” Supreme Court’s pivotal Second Amendment decision, District of Columbia v.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d459/3d4599bd877ec53c78c64c1f05efae330ab839a2" alt="have drunk drivers killed more people than wars have drunk drivers killed more people than wars"
Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), a Harvard Law School graduate, told a breathtaking whopper about the U.S. In an outright misrepresentation (or as we like to call them, lies), Rep. Brackney’s statements may have been one of the only honest claims of the entire hearing by those arguing in favor of the ban. Police Chief saying that all means of self-defense should be outlawed, while sitting on the side of the table that would be allowed to keep weapons should the government ever follow her advice? Check it out today.ĭoes anyone else have an issue with Dr.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c17e/2c17e282f3a5ac7782dc9e6e72405306872d0ef3" alt="have drunk drivers killed more people than wars have drunk drivers killed more people than wars"
Every penny gets reinvested into giving these heroes a voice. Steube tried asking again, only to be interrupted by an anti-gun committee member who tried to raise a point of order.ĭid you know that Law Enforcement Today has a private new home for those who support emergency responders and veterans? It’s called LET Unity, and it’s where we share the untold stories of those patriotic Americans. Brackney began talking about police and the social contract. Rather than answering the question directly, Dr. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) asked her directly, “Okay, so you then stand for the proposition to ban any type of firearm, because any firearm can be used and misused to kill people.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6992/d6992ac5e3821e78dfd3d5538fe3dfe58fbe97d3" alt="have drunk drivers killed more people than wars have drunk drivers killed more people than wars"
Instead, she dug in and reiterated the statement. Brackney was given two opportunities by pro-gun committee members to walk back or provide more context for that statement. While Brackney did not actually call for a ban of these other items, that is essentially what she is doing in using such careless language.Īccording to the NRA, Dr.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffa0a/ffa0a47e2ec6dc27680ff0e94671e82e416f544b" alt="Have drunk drivers killed more people than wars"